[ Previous Page]  [ Home Page ]

The following opinion is presented on-line for informational use only and does not replace the official version. (Mich Dept of Attorney General Web Site - www.ag.state.mi.us)



STATE OF MICHIGAN

FRANK J. KELLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL


Opinion No. 6058

April 21, 1982

STATE OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES:

Surety bonds for Municipal Employees' Retirement System

RETIREMENT SYSTEMS:

Municipal Employees' Retirement System--liability of board members

Officers and employees of the Municipal Employees' Retirement System are not covered by the provisions of the state blanket bond authorized by 1969 PA 10.

Newly appointed members of the Municipal Employees' Retirement Board are not personally liable for the actions taken by the board before their appointment.

Mr. John W. Fonger

Manager

Municipal Employees' Retirement System

Stevens T. Mason Building

P.O. Box 30026

Lansing, Michigan

You have requested my opinion as to the extent to which the Municipal Employees' Retirement System is covered by the state blanket faithful performance bond. You also ask what liability a member of the Board incurs upon acceptance of an appointment to the Board.

The Municipal Employees' Retirement Act, 1945 PA 135; MCLA 38.601 et seq; MSA 5.4001 et seq, provides for the establishment of the Municipal Employees' Retirement System, hereafter MERS. MERS is composed of local governmental units which voluntarily elect to come under the provisions of the Act for the economies of scale and expertise to be gained from their combined size. 1945 PA 135, supra, Sec. 6 et seq.

The administration of MERS and the authority to make rules for the System are vested in the Municipal Employees' Retirement Board which is composed of, ex officio, the State Treasurer, three officers of participating municipalities and three participating employees appointed by the Governor. 1945 PA 135, supra, Sec. 3. Each member of the Board, upon appointment, takes an oath of office. 1945 PA 135, supra, Sec. 11. The members of the Board serve without compensation for their services. 1945 PA 135, Sec. 11, supra.

1945 PA 135, supra, Sec. 15(e), requires the State Treasurer to file a bond:

'The state treasurer shall be treasurer of the retirement system. . . . The state treasurer shall give a separate and additional bond in such amount as may be fixed by the board in the sum of not to exceed $100,000.00, which bond shall be approved by the board and the attorney general and shall be conditioned for the faithful performance of his duties as custodian of the funds of the retirement system provided for herein. The cost of such bond shall be paid out of the expense fund of the retirement system. Such bond shall be deposited with the secretary of state and kept in his office.'

1945 PA 135, supra, is silent concerning all other employees and officers of MERS on the issue of providing a bond conditioned on faithful performance of duties. The express mention in a statute of one thing implies exclusion of all other similar things. Sebewaing Industries, Inc v Village of Sebewaing, 337 Mich 530; 60 NW2d 444 (1953). The remaining Municipal Employees' Retirement Board members are, therefore, not required by 1945 PA 135, supra, to file a faithful performance bond.

1969 PA 10; MCLA 15.1 et seq; MSA 3.930(11) et seq, provides for the establishment of uniform bond coverage for officers and employees of state departments and agencies. 1969 PA 10, supra, Sec. 1, provides:

'Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law, officers and employees of all state departments and agencies that are required by statute or in the discretion of the director of the department covered, or otherwise to furnish bonds conditioned for their honesty or faithful discharge of their duties shall be covered by a blanket bond or bonds as a departmental group or as a state group by corporate surety companies as approved by the director of the department of administration. Treasurers and tax collectors by whatever title known may be covered by individual bonds.'

The Director of the Department of Management and Budget is to determine, after consultation with the Director of the Department of Commerce, the conditions of each bond and whether a single state bond for all state officers and employees or departmental bonds 'would best serve the state.' [Emphasis added.] 1969 PA 10, supra, Sec. 2.

The Director of the Department of Management and Budget has decided to secure a 'blanket bond' for all employees of the executive and legislative branches of the State of Michigan, except state senators and representatives, pursuant to 1969 PA 10, supra. The blanket bond provides that the surety will indemnify the people of the State of Michigan for losses caused by the failure of state officers or employees, acting alone or with others, to perform faithfully their duties or to account properly for all monies and property received by virtue of their position or employment. The total amount of indemnity available for a loss is $1,000,000 with a higher limit if caused by several employees.

The state 'blanket bond' established pursuant to 1969 PA 10, supra, addresses only state funds. MERS is , though administered at the state level, a local government retirement program. The state is not liable for funding or paying the benefits of local government retirement programs including MERS. OAG, 1975-1976, No 5076, p 563 (August 9, 1976).

It is my opinion, therefore, that the officers and employees of the Municipal Employees' Retirement System, holding only local funds, are not covered by the state blanket bond established pursuant to 1969 PA 10, supra.

You have also asked what liability a member of Municipal Employees' Retirement Board incurs upon acceptance of the Governor's appointment to the Board?

The investment duties of Municipal Employees' Retirement Board are established by law. 1945 PA 135, supra, Sec. 61, provides:

'INVESTMENT OF FUNDS. The members of the board shall be the trustees of the several funds created by this act and the board shall have full power to invest and reinvest such funds subject to all terms, conditions, limitations and restrictions imposed by the laws of the state of Michigan upon life insurance companies in the making and disposing of their investments. The board shall have full power to hold, sell, assign, transfer and dispose of any of the securities and investments in which any of the funds created herein shall have been invested as well as the proceeds of said investments and any moneys belonging to the retirement system.'

Public officers are subject to fiduciary duties in the conduct of their office. OAG, 1981-1982, No 5864, p 64 (March 17, 1981). That opinion cites People ex rel Plugger v Twp Board of Overyssel, 11 Mich 222, 226-227 (1863), concerning the responsibility of public officers where matters of personal interest are involved:

'[The] public were entitled to their best judgment, unbiased by their private interests, and by accepting the [public] office they became bound to exercise such judgment, and to use their best exertions for the public good, regardless of their own. They had no right, while they continued in office, to place themselves in a position where their own interests would be hostile to those of the public.'

It is to be noted that 1945 PA 135, supra, Sec. 62, provides:

'NO EMPLOYEE SHALL GAIN FROM INVESTMENTS. Except as provided herein, no member or employee of the board shall have any interest direct or indirect in the gains or profits of any investments made by the board, nor as such directly or indirectly receive any pay or emolument for his services. No member or other person connected with the board directly or indirectly, for himself or as an agent or partner of others, shall borrow any of the funds or deposits of the retirement system, or in any manner use the same, except to make such current and necessary payments as are authorized by the board; nor shall any member or employee of the board become an endorser or surety or become in any manner an obligor for moneys loaned by or borrowed of the board.'

The members of the Municipal Employees' Retirement Board, upon their appointment, must provide the public with their best judgment, unbiased by private interests, and exercise their powers with proper prudence and diligence. Those duties apply, however, only to the Board member's own actions. Newly appointed Board members are not personally liable for the actions taken by the Board before appointment.

It is my opinion, therefore, that Municipal Employees' Retirement Board members do not inherit any personal liability upon acceptance of their appointment to the Board.

Frank J. Kelley

Attorney General


[ Previous Page]  [ Home Page ]