[ Previous Page]  [ Home Page ]

The following opinion is presented on-line for informational use only and does not replace the official version. (Mich Dept of Attorney General Web Site - www.ag.state.mi.us)



STATE OF MICHIGAN

FRANK J. KELLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL


Opinion No. 6621

July 13, 1989

HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS:

Contract with or employment of chiropractors

NON PROFIT HEALTH CARE CORPORATION REFORM ACT:

Reimbursement of chiropractors for covered services

PRUDENT PURCHASERS:

Reimbursement of chiropractors not members of provider panel

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan is required, under its traditional health care coverage, to reimburse chiropractors for those services which chiropractors are licensed to perform and which are covered under a subscribers health care certificate.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan is not obligated, as part of its coverage through Prudent Purchase Act agreements, to provide services capable of being performed by licensed chiropractors but where such services are covered in such agreements, it may not discriminate against chiropractors in establishing provider panels for services a chiropractor is qualified to perform. It may not refuse to reimburse chiropractors who are not members of the provider panel for providing services on an emergency basis, or for covered services for which beneficiaries are not required to seek treatment solely from members of the provider panel.

While a health maintenance organization is not required to provide those services which chiropractors are licensed to provide, if it does provide such services, it may not refuse to contract with or employ chiropractors as a class of health professionals but must base its health professionals hiring decisions on factors such as those designed to promote cost-effective quality health care.

Honorable Lynn Owen

State Representative

The Capitol

Lansing, Michigan 48909

You have requested my opinion as to whether Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM) is obligated under statutory anti-discrimination provisions to provide reimbursement to chiropractors for certain services rendered to subscribers of traditional health care coverage, Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) and Preferred Provider Associations (PPAs).

Chiropractors are licensed pursuant to Article 15, Part 164 of the Public Health Code, 1978 PA 368, Sec. 16401 et seq, MCL 333.16401 et seq; MSA 14.15(16401) et seq. The "practice of chiropractic" is defined by Sec. 16401(b) to mean

"that discipline within the healing arts which deals with the nervous system and its relationship to the spinal column and its interrelationship with other body systems. Practice of chiropractic includes:

"(i) Diagnosis, including spinal analysis, to determine the existence of spinal subluxations or misalignments that produce nerve interference, indicating the necessity for chiropractic care.

"(ii) The adjustment of spinal subluxations or misalignments and related bones and tissues for the establishment of neural integrity utilizing the inherent recuperative powers of the body for restoration and maintenance of health.

"(iii) The use of analytical instruments, nutritional advice, rehabilitative exercise and adjustment apparatus regulated by rules promulgated by the board pursuant to section 16423, and the use of x-ray machines in the examination of patients for the purpose of locating spinal subluxations or misaligned vertebrae of the human spine. The practice of chiropractic does not include the performance of incisive surgical procedures, the performance of an invasive procedure requiring instrumentation, or the dispensing or prescribing of drugs or medicine." MCL 333.16401(b); MSA 14.15(16401)(b).

Thus, the scope of chiropractic practice is very limited, and chiropractors may only diagnose and treat spinal subluxations or misalignments. Attorney General v Beno, 422 Mich 293, 317; 373 NW2d 544 (1985); OAG, 1987-1988, No 6523, p 338 (June 9, 1988).

BCBSM is a non-profit health care corporation regulated by the Commissioner of Insurance pursuant to the Nonprofit Health Care Corporation Reform Act, 1980 PA 350, MCL 550.1101 et seq, MSA 24.660(101) et seq (hereinafter Act 350). BCBSM offers traditional health care coverage pursuant to Act 350, HMO coverage as authorized by Act 350, Sec. 207(h), MCL 550.1207(h); MSA 24.660(207)(h), and health care coverage pursuant to prudent purchaser agreements as authorized by Act 350, Sec. 502a, MCL 550.1502a; MSA 24.660(502a). BCBSM HMOs are further regulated pursuant to Article 17, Part 210 of the Public Health Code, MCL 333.21001 et seq; MSA 14.15(21001) et seq. BCBSM prudent purchaser agreements are further authorized and regulated pursuant to the Prudent Purchaser Act, 1984 PA 233, MCL 5S0.51 et seq; MSA 24.650(51) et seq. Act 350 exempts BCBSM from the requirements of the Insurance Code of 1956, 1956 PA 218, MCL 500.100 et seq; MSA 24.1100 et seq, unless such provisions are expressly made applicable by Act 350, MCL 550.1201(4), MSA 24.660(201)(4). Since there are no provisions of the Insurance Code of 1956 which are relevant to the issues you have presented, the Insurance Code of 1956 need not be addressed.

Because the statutory requirements imposed on BCBSM differ when offering traditional coverage, prudent purchaser agreements, or HMO coverage, each will be addressed separately.

A. BCBSM Traditional Health Care Coverage

BCBSM traditional health care coverage means health care coverage provided under a certificate issued by BCBSM pursuant to Sec. 607 of Act 350, MCL 550.1607; MSA 24.660(607). The certificate is the contract between the subscriber and BCBSM which sets forth the benefits to which the subscriber is entitled. BCBSM is permitted to reimburse chiropractors for those services provided to subscribers that chiropractors may legally perform and chiropractors are considered "providers" of those services. MCL 550.1105(4); MSA 24.660(105)(4).

Section 502(3) of Act 350, MCL 550.1502(3); MSA 24.660(502)(3), contains the anti-discrimination language to which you refer. This section states:

"A health care corporation shall not restrict the methods of diagnosis or treatment of professional health care providers who treat members. Except as otherwise provided in section 502a, each member of the health care corporation shall at all times have a choice of professional health care providers. This subsection shall not apply to limitations in benefits contained in certificates, to the reimbursement provisions of a provider contract or reimbursement arrangement, nor to standards set by the corporation for all contracting providers. A health care corporation may refuse to reimburse a health care provider for health care services which are overutilized, including those services rendered, ordered, or prescribed to an extent which is greater than reasonably necessary."

This section has been interpreted to mean that while BCBSM is not required to provide coverage for services unless mandated elsewhere in Act 350, where the certificate does establish coverage for certain health care services, all health professionals licensed to provide those services are entitled to reimbursement. Thus, chiropractors are entitled to reimbursement for services if the certificate includes their services as covered health care services, provided that chiropractors are licensed to provide such services.

In Cowan v BCBSM, 166 MichApp 568; 421 NW2d 243 (1988), involving the obligations of BCBSM in entering prudent purchaser agreements, the court concluded that BCBSM was not required under Sec. 502 to provide coverage for those services which chiropractors are licensed to perform:

"To a great extent, the third sentence of Sec. 502(3) takes away what the first purports to grant and commits the scope of defendants coverage obligations to the hands of the contracting parties.

"This language evidences a legislative intention to commit the scope of covered therapeutic services to the contracting parties, at the expense of both the doctor-patient relationship and the patient's freedom of choice. Where a given medical benefit is not mandated by the statute, its exclusion does not implicate doctor-patient relationship or patient choice concerns cognizable under defendant's [BCBSM's] enabling laws." Cowan, supra, 166 MichApp at 571-572.

While BCBSM is not obligated to provide coverage for those services chiropractors are licensed to provide, chiropractors cannot be denied reimbursement if those services are covered. OAG, 1985-1986, No 6410, p 447, (December 22, 1986), dealt with the reimbursement of optometrists and ophthalmologists and concluded that BCBSM could not deny reimbursement to optometrists when the eye care services covered in the certificates could be performed by either class of health professional. Similarly, OAG 1989-1990, No 6567, p --- (February 1, 1989), concluded that BCBSM may not deny reimbursement to licensed nurses for those services which are covered under the certificate and which nurses are licensed to perform without delegation and supervision by a physician.

Thus, to answer your question in regard to BCBSM traditional health care coverage, BCBSM is required to reimburse chiropractors for those services which chiropractors are licensed to perform, and which are covered under the subscriber's health care certificate.

B. Preferred Provider Agreement

Preferred Providers Associations (PPAs) are an alternative health care delivery system to that offered under a traditional health care plan. The theory underlying PPAs is that health care costs can be controlled and quality health care provided if organizations purchasing care can selectively contract with health care providers to obtain the most efficient reimbursement arrangements. Pursuant to Sec. 2(j) of the Prudent Purchaser Act, MCL 550.52(j); MSA 24.650(52)(j), the organizations which can take advantage of PPAs are insurers, dental care corporations, hospital service corporations, medical care corporations, health care corporations, or third party administrators. BCBSM, as a health care corporation, is further authorized and regulated in entering into PPAs by Sec. 502a of Act 350, MCL 550.1502a; MSA 24.660(502a). The group of providers with contractual agreements with the purchaser is referred to as the provider panel. Health care coverage provided to beneficiaries under PPAs can require that nonemergency treatment be obtained exclusively from members of the provider panel, or can merely provide financial incentives to beneficiaries to utilize the services of the provider panel. MCL 550.1502a(2) and (4); MSA 24.660(502a)(2) and (4).

Section 3 of the Prudent Purchaser Act, MCL 550.53; MSA 24.650(53), places certain restrictions on the purchaser's ability to exclude providers from the provider panel. Section 3(1) states:

"An organization may enter into prudent purchaser agreements with 1 or more health care providers of a specific service to control health care costs, assure appropriate utilization of health care services, and maintain quality of health care. The organization may limit the number of prudent purchaser agreements entered into pursuant to this section, if the number of such agreements is sufficient to assure reasonable levels of access to health care services for recipients of those services. The number of prudent purchaser agreements authorized by this section which are necessary to assure reasonable levels of access to health care services for recipients shall be determined by the organization. However, the organization shall offer a prudent purchaser agreement, comparable to those agreements with other members of the provider panel, to a health care provider located within a reasonable distance from the recipients of such health care services, if a health care provider is located within that reasonable distance."

Section 3(6) requires:

"If 2 or more classes of health care providers may legally provide the same health care service, the organization shall offer each class of health care providers the opportunity to apply to the organization for membership on the provider panel." MCL 550.53(6); MSA 24.650(53)(6).

These sections thus impose certain restrictions on the ability of the purchaser to discriminate against any provider or class of provider. Once a panel is formed, all providers in a given geographic area are entitled to be members of the provider panel and enter into prudent purchaser agreements if they are willing to accept the same terms as other members of the panel. Moreover, all providers who are licensed to provide a given service must be offered the opportunity for membership on the provider panel. Neither of these sections, however, requires that those services which chiropractors are licensed to perform be covered services under the applicable certificate. Nor does subsection (6) require that chiropractors be made members of the provider panel, merely that they be given the opportunity, in good faith, to meet the criteria established for providers.

In addition, Sec. 502a of Act 350 contains anti-discrimination language which limits the ability of BCBSM to exclude health care providers from its provider panels:

"(11) A corporation shall not discriminate against a class of health care providers when entering into prudent purchaser agreements with health care providers for its provider panel. This subsection shall not be construed to:

"(a) Prohibit the formation of a provider panel consisting of a single class of providers when a service provided for in the specifications of a purchaser may be legally provided only by a single class of providers.

"(b) Prohibit the formation of a provider panel which conforms to the specifications of a purchaser of the coverage authorized by this section so long as the specifications do not exclude any class of health care providers who may legally perform the services included in the coverage.

"(c) Require an organization which has uniformly applied the standards filed pursuant to section 3(3) of the prudent purchaser act to contract with any individual provider." MCL 550.1502a(11); MSA 24.660(502a)(11), as last amended by 1988 PA 283.

Where the applicable certificate includes those services that a chiropractor.is legally authorized to perform, BCBSM cannot refuse to have chiropractors on its provider panel; the chiropractors on the panel may thus obtain reimbursement pursuant to the terms of the PPA.

In Cowan v BCBSM, supra, plaintiff chiropractors challenged the "Trust" PPA of BCBSM claiming that the PPA's exclusion of virtually all chiropractic services, given that chiropractors were members of the provider panel, violated the requirements of Sec. 502a. The Court of Appeals interpreted the requirements of the Prudent Purchaser Act, consistent with its interpretation of Sec. 502 of Act 350, to require reimbursement only for those services which are covered by the subscriber contract and which chiropractors are licensed to perform:

"Plaintiffs compare defendant's TRUST to a group health care package which is required by law to include dentists in its provider group, but refuses coverage for all dental work. This analogy is only slightly hyperbolic. In fact, TRUST's provision for payment of x-rays and emergency chiropractic adjustments saves the panel membership provisions from utter negation. Nevertheless, so long as TRUST makes these de minimis concessions to chiropractic and limits its coverage provisions so as not to reimburse other classes of physicians for procedures which chiropractors are licensed to perform, plaintiffs have no discrimination claim under the PPA." Cowan, supra, 166 MichApp at 572.

In addition, reimbursement can be made by BCBSM to providers who are not members of the provider panel in one of two circumstances. First, persons receiving care under PPAs may not be required to receive care from the provider panel exclusively, but instead, receive a financial incentive to receive care from these providers. MCL 550.1502a(4); MSA 24.660(502a)(4). Under these circumstances, as with traditional BCBSM coverage, BCBSM could not discriminate against a class of providers for the provision of services which are part of the coverage offered. This is clear since the Prudent Purchaser Act states that purchasers authorized under the Act are required to conform to their enabling act, MCL 550.58; MSA 24.650(58), so that BCBSM would be required to comply with Sec. 502 of Act 350, MCL 550.1502; MSA 24.660(502).

The second circumstance in which health professionals who are not members of the provider panel will be reimbursed by BCBSM deals with the provision of emergency services. Providers of services to beneficiaries or subscribers under the plan of the organization can be reimbursed for providing emergency services as set forth in Sec. 3(11) of the Prudent Purchaser Act:

"If a person who has coverage authorized by this act is entitled to receive a health care service when rendered by a health care provider who is a member of a provider panel, the person shall be entitled to receive the health care service from a health care provider who is not a member of the provider panel for an emergency episode of illness or injury which requires immediate treatment before it can be obtained from a health care provider who is on the provider panel." MCL 550.53(11); MSA 24.650(53)(11).

Since a chiropractor is a health care provider as to those services which he or she is licensed to perform, BCBSM cannot refuse to reimburse chiropractors for emergency services provided pursuant to Sec. 3(11).

Thus, to summarize, BCBSM is not obligated to provide those services which chiropractors are licensed to perform as part of the coverage it offers through PPAs. Where such services are covered in a PPA, however:

(1) BCBSM may not discriminate against chiropractors in establishing provider panels for covered services a chiropractor is qualified to perform; and

(2) BCBSM may not refuse to reimburse chiropractors who are not members of the provider panel for providing covered services on an emergency basis, or for covered services for which beneficiaries are not required to seek treatment solely from members of the provider panel.

C. HMOs

HMOs are another alternative to the traditional insurance mechanism of health care delivery. The arrangements for the provision of services to enrollees under HMO plans differ from traditional BCBSM health care plans in that HMOs are both the payers and providers of health care. The HMO ensures that medically appropriate services are provided to enrollees by employing or contracting with physicians and other health care providers. The HMO is responsible for the quality of care provided. MCL 333.20106; MSA 14.15(20106), defines a "health maintenance organization" as

"a health facility or agency that:

"(a) Delivers health maintenance services which are medically indicated to enrollees under the terms of its health maintenance contract, directly or through contracts with affiliated providers, in exchange for a fixed prepaid sum or per capita prepayment, without regard to the frequency, extent, or kind of health services.

"(b) Is responsible for the availability, accessibility, and quality of the health maintenance services provided."

MCL 33.21053(4); MSA 14.15(21053)(4), authorizes HMOs to contract with or directly engage health professionals and affiliated providers to render the services the organization has agreed to provide under the terms of the health maintenance contract. "Health professionals" include any "individual licensed, certified, or authorized in accordance with state law to practice a health profession in his or her respective state." MCL 333.21005(4); MSA 14.15(21005)(4). "Affiliated providers" include health professionals "having a contract with a health maintenance organization to render 1 or more health maintenance services to an enrollee." MCL 333.21002; MSA 14.15(21002). Thus, HMOs may contract with and reimburse chiropractors for care provided to subscribers.

The "health maintenance contract" establishes the benefits to which the subscribers are entitled, MCL 333.21005(1); MSA 14.15(21005)(1), and must include the services required by Sec. 21034(d), as specified in Sec. 21007(1), and may include other services. MCL 333.21007(1) and 333.21034(d); MSA 14.15(21007)(1) and 14.15(21034)(d). Chiropractic services are no longer required to be included in health maintenance contracts, since the requirement imposed by 1978 PA 368, Secs. 21008(g) and 21034(d), that chiropractic services be offered by HMOs three years after the HMO license is issued, was repealed by 1982 PA 354. As OAG, 1987-1988, No 6523, supra, concluded, although there is no requirement that chiropractic services be provided to HMO subscribers as a matter of law, health maintenance contracts entered into between the HMO and a subscriber or a group of subscribers may require the provision of such services. Under the contract between an HMO and the state at issue in OAG, 1987-1988, No 6523, supra, chiropractic services were to be provided when medically necessary. (The contract language was "[t]he [HMO] shall provide, or arrange for the provision of, the following services which covered persons may require [including] ... practitioners' services, such as those provided by physicians, optometrists, podiatrists, and chiropractors.") It is noted that it was not required that the primary physicians be chiropractors, but that where the primary physician determined that chiropractic services were medically necessary, that such services be provided.

The anti-discrimination provision to which you refer in your opinion request is MCL 33.21053(4); MSA 14.15(21053)(4), which states:

"In meeting the requirements of section 21021, the health maintenance organization may contract with or employ health professionals on the basis of cost, quality, availability of services to the membership, conformity to the administrative procedures of the health maintenance organization, and other factors relevant to delivery of economical, quality care, but shall not discriminate solely on the basis of the class of health professionals to which the health professional belongs."

MCL 333.21021(a); MSA 14.15(21021)(a), requires the HMO to provide an acceptable quality of health care by qualified health personnel. If chiropractic services are not covered under the health maintenance contract, no question of discrimination is raised. Where such services are provided under the health maintenance contract, the HMO may not refuse either to contract with or to employ chiropractors solely because of the class of health care providers to which they belong. Instead, the HMO should base its decision on factors "relevant to the delivery of economical quality care." Id.

Thus, to summarize the HMO aspect of your question, HMOs are not required to provide those services which chiropractors are licensed to perform. Where an HMO does provide these services, however, and seeks to contract or employ health professionals to provide the services, it cannot refuse to contract with or employ chiropractors as a class of health professionals, but must base its decisions concerning the hiring of health professionals on other factors, those designed to promote cost-effective quality health care.

Frank J. Kelley

Attorney General


[ Previous Page]  [ Home Page ]