[ Previous Page]  [ Home Page ]

The following opinion is presented on-line for informational use only and does not replace the official version. (Mich Dept of Attorney General Web Site - www.ag.state.mi.us)



STATE OF MICHIGAN

FRANK J. KELLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL


Opinion No. 5709

May 20, 1980

MENTAL HEALTH:

Community mental health boards

Patient rights

A county community mental health board may obtain information concerning specific recipients of mental health services from private or public agencies with which it has contracted to provide mental health services to such recipients without necessity for securing the recipient's approval. Such information may be shared within the units of the community mental health program.

Honorable Claude A. Trim

State Representative

The Capitol

Lansing, Michigan 48909

You have requested my opinion on the following questions:

(1) May a county community mental health board, which is legally defined as the 'Governing Body' and 'the Provider' of mental health services--require information about specific clients from the service provider agencies with which it contracts without the express agreement of the client?

(2) May such a county community mental health board require its contracting service providers to share information about clients with each other, inasmuch as they are both part of the same single county mental health system?

1974 PA 258; MCLA 330.1001 et seq; MSA 14.800(1) et seq, 1974 PA 258, supra, MCLA 330.1200 et seq, is known as the Mental Health Code. 1974 PA 258, supra, ch 2, Sec. 200, et seq provides for county community mental health programs. 1974 PA 258, supra, Sec. 206 states that '[t]he purpose of a county community mental health program shall be to provide a range of mental health services for persons who are located within that county.' 1974 PA 258, supra, Sec. 208, as last amended by 1978 PA 166, requires that a minimum level of services be furnished through the county program. Upon establishment of a county mental health program, a twelve (12) member county community health board is established pursuant to 1974 PA 258, supra, Secs. 212 and 222.

1974 PA 258, supra, Sec. 226 sets forth the powers and duties of the county community mental health board and under subsection (g), the county community mental health board is empowered to approve and authorize all contracts for the providing of mental health services. Consideration must also be given to 1974 PA 258, supra, Sec. 226(h), which directs the county community health board to review and evaluate the quality, effectiveness and efficiency of services provided through the county program. Further, 1974 PA 258, supra, Sec. 226(j) permits the board to establish general policy guidelines within which the county program shall be executed by the director of the program. Also pertinent is 1974 PA 258, supra, Sec. 228, which states

'Subject to the provisions of this chapter, a board is authorized to enter into contracts for the purchase of mental health services with private or public agencies. . . .'

1974 PA 258, supra, ch 7, Sec. 700, et seq, sets forth the rights of recipients of mental health services. OAG, 1979-1980, No 5502, p ___ (July 2, 1979). 1974 PA 258, supra, Sec. 702(a) specifies that the receipt of mental health services '[s]hall not operate to deprive any person of his rights, benefits, or privileges.'

1974 PA 258, supra, Sec. 746, which concerns the records of recipients, states:

'(1) A complete record shall be kept current for each recipient of mental health services. The record shall at least include information pertinent to the services provided to the recipient, pertinent to the legal status of the recipient, required by this chapter or other provision of law, and required by rules or policies.

(2) The material in the record shall be confidential to the extent it is made confidential by section 748.'

In 1974 PA 258, supra, Sec. 748, the legislature has provided:

'(1) Information in the record of a recipient, and other information acquired in the course of providing mental health services to a recipient, shall be kept confidential and shall not be open to public inspection. The information may be disclosed outside the department, county community mental health program, or licensed private facility, (1) whichever is the holder of the record, only in the circumstances and under the conditions set forth in this section.

(2) When information is disclosed, the identity of the individual to whom it pertains shall be protected and shall not be disclosed unless it is germane to the authorized purpose for which disclosure was sought; and, when practicable, no other information shall be disclosed unless it is germane to the authorized purpose for which disclosure was sought.

(3) Any person receiving information made confidential by this section shall disclose the information to others only to the extent consistent with the authorized purpose for which the information was obtained.

. . .

(5) Information may be disclosed if the holder of the record and the recipient, his parents if he is a minor, or his legally appointed guardian consent:

(a) To providers of mental health services to the recipient.

(b) To the recipient or any other person or agency, provided that in the judgment of the holder the disclosure would not be detrimental to the recipient or others.

(6) Information may be disclosed in the discretion of the holder of the record:

(a) As necessary in order for the recipient to apply for or receive benefits.

(b) As necessary for the purpose of outside research, evaluation, accreditation, or statistical compilation, provided that the person who is the subject [sic, 'subject'] of the information can be identified from the disclosed information only when such identification is essential in order to achieve the purpose for which the information is sought or when preventing such identification would clearly be impractical, but in no event when the subject of the information is likely to be harmed by such identification.

(c) To providers of mental or other health services or a public agency when there is a compelling need for disclosure based upon a substantial probability of harm to the recipient or other persons.' [Emphasis supplied.]

Further, 1974 PA 258, supra, Sec. 750, specifies that communications between a mental health recipient and a psychiatrist or psychologist are privileged. See also RJA, 1961, Sec. 2157; MCLA 600.2157; MSA 27A.2157; People v Lapsley, 26 Mich App 424; 182 NW2d 601 (1970), lv app den 384 Mich 825 (1971); the freedom of information act, 1976 PA 442, as amended; Sec. 13(1)(i); MCLA 15.243(1)(i); MSA 4.1801(13)(1)(i).

(1) May a county community mental health board, which is legally defined as the 'Governing Body' and 'the Provider' of mental health services--require information about specific clients from the service provider agencies with which it contracts without the express agreement of the client?

1974 PA 258, Sec. 748(1), supra, provides that information concerning a recipient may be disclosed 'outside' the county community mental health program only as provided in section 748. This provision is designed to protect against the dissemination of information to facilities or persons outside the community mental health program. Where a recipient receives mental health services pursuant to a county community health program, the county program is the 'holder' of the record under 1974 PA 258, Sec. 748(1), supra. Thus, information concerning recipients may be circulated within units of the community mental health program, which includes those private or public agencies with which the county mental health board has contracted for mental health services, pursuant to 1974 PA 258, Sec. 228, supra.

A review of mental health recipients' privacy rights prior to the enactment of 1974 PA 258, Sec. 748, supra, is instructive.

Community mental health service programs were initially established pursuant to 1963 PA 54. (2) Thereafter, 1973 PA 85 added Sec. 15 to 1963 PA 54, supra, to provide:

'The department of mental health in developing and operating its community services data system shall insure that a patient's right of privacy is held inviolate and to this end the department will not collect and store community services data which would make it possible to identify a patient by name. Further, no such information in the possession of the department prior to the effective date of this section [August 5, 1973] may be disclosed.' (3)

1974 PA 107 (4) was enacted to provide for the licensing and regulation of mental hospitals, psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric units. 1974 PA 107, supra, Sec. 9, stated:

'The director [of the department of mental health] shall make inspections, require reports, have access to information to the extent necessary to carry out the purposes of this act and the rules promulgated by him. A licensee shall include on a patient's medical chart a complete record of the purpose of hospitalization, of tests and examinations performed, and of observations made and treatments provided. Representatives of the department of mental health shall respect the confidentiality of records pertaining to patient care, and shall not disclose the contents of the records or the identity of the patient, except upon court order.'

Thus, under the former provisions of 1963 PA 54, Sec. 15, supra, the privacy of patients who received community mental health services was to be held inviolate, and patient data may not be maintained in any manner whereby a patient may be identified by name. Further, under 1974 PA 107, Sec. 9, supra, patients' privacy rights were further safeguarded as patient records were to be held confidential by the department of mental health, and neither the contents of a record nor the name of a patient may be disclosed without court order. However, no provision of 1963 PA 53, supra, or 1974 PA 107, supra, in safeguarding the privacy rights of recipients of mental health services prohibited the dissemination of a patient's record information within the framework of the mental health system, in furtherance of the furnishing of mental health services.

When enacting a comprehensive statute, such as 1974 PA 258, supra, the legislature is presumed to have knowledge of existing statutes. Skidmore v Czapiga, 82 Mich App 689; 267 NW2d 150, lv den 403 Mich 810 (1978). Therefore, it must be presumed the legislature in enacting 1974 PA 258, Sec. 748, supra, was cognizant of the provisions of 1963 PA 54, Sec. 15, supra, and 1974 PA 107, Sec. 9, supra.

Thus, information concerning a recipient which is circulated within the community mental health program must be held as confidential information and not open to public inspection; 1974 PA 258, Sec. 748(1), supra. Further, 1974 PA 258, Sec. 748(5)(a), supra, provides that information may be disclosed to others who provide mental health services to the recipient, where the holder of the record and the recipient (or the minor recipient's parents, or guardian) consent; this provision is applicable to dissemination of information to a facility which is not part of the community mental health program. However, it must be emphasized that information concerning a recipient which is utilized within the framework of the county mental health program must not disclose the identity of the recipient, unless germane to the authorized purpose for which the information was sought, and no other information shall be disclosed unless germane to such authorized purpose. 1974 PA 258, Sec. 748(2), supra. The mode of proceding mental health services must 'protect and promote the basic human dignity to which a recipient of services is entitled.' 1974 PA 258, supra, Sec. 704(3).

Therefore, it is my opinion that a county community mental health board may obtain information concerning specific recipients from private or public agencies with which it has contracted to provide mental health services to recipients, where such information is sought for a purpose germane to the county mental health program, without procuring the consent of the recipient.

(2) May such a county community mental health board require its contracting service providers to share, information about clients with each other, inasmuch as they are both of the same single county mental health system?

In accordance with my response to your first question, and in light of the powers and duties of county community mental health boards set out in 1974 PA 258, Sec. 226, supra, it is also my opinion that a county community mental health board may require the service providers with which it contracts to share information concerning recipients, so long as such information is germane to the provision of mental health services, subject to the provisions of 1974 PA 258, Sec. 748, supra, provided that such information is not disseminated outside the county mental health program.

Frank J. Kelley

Attorney General

(1) 'Facility' is defined in 1974 PA 258, supra, Sec. 700(c) as 'a residential facility which provides mental health services, which is licensed by the state or is operated by or under contract with a public agency.'

(2) Repealed by 1974 PA 258, supra, Sec. 1106(a).

(3) This provision appears in substantially the same language in 1974 PA 258, supra, Sec. 244(b)(ii).

(4) Repealed by 1974 PA 258, Sec. 1106(a), supra fn 1.

 


[ Previous Page]  [ Home Page ]