[ Previous Page]  [ Home Page ]

The following opinion is presented on-line for informational use only and does not replace the official version. (Mich Dept of Attorney General Web Site - www.ag.state.mi.us)



STATE OF MICHIGAN

FRANK J. KELLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL


Opinion No. 5872

April 10, 1981

COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT:

Effect of attachment of intermediate school district upon boundaries of community college district

SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS:

Attachment of intermediate school district

Levy of intermediate school district taxes in attached territory

If the territory of a disorganized intermediate school district is attached to another intermediate school district whose territory is wholly within the territory of a community college district, the attached area does not become a part of and subject to the property taxes levied by the community college district.

Upon attachment of a disorganized intermediate school district to another intermediate school district, the area attached becomes subject to the property taxes levied for special education programs of the attaching intermediate school district.

The Honorable Donald E. Bishop

State Senator

The Capitol

Lansing, Michigan

You have requested my opinion on two questions which may be phrased as follows:

1. If the Lake Intermediate School District is disorganized and the constituent Baldwin Community School District is attached (1) to the Mason Intermediate School District, which is wholly within the boundaries of the West Shore Community College District, does the area comprising the Baldwin Community School District become a part of and subject to the property taxes levied by such community college district?

2. If the Lake Intermediate School District is disorganized and the constituent Baldwin Community School District is attached to the Mason Intermediate School District, will the area comprising the constituent Baldwin Community School District be subject to the property taxes levied by the Mason Intermediate School District for special education programs?

The question of the effect of the annexation of an intermediate school district to another intermediate school district upon the territorial boundary of a community college district formed from the territory of the annexing intermediate district and another intermediate district was considered in a letter opinion addressed to Representative Cawthorne, dated April 22, 1976, and it was concluded that the annexation of the Lake Intermediate School District to the Mason Intermediate School District would not result in the geographical area of the Lake Intermediate School District becoming a part of and subject to the property taxes levied by the West Shore Community College District. Similarly, 1976 PA 451, Sec. 703, supra, which deals with disorganizing intermediate school districts comprised of less than five constituent school districts by attaching the constituent districts to other intermediate school districts, contains no language providing that the expansion of intermediate school district boundaries thereunder also results in the expansion of community college district boundaries.

It is, therefore, my opinion that if the Lake Intermediate School District is disorganized and the constituent Baldwin Community School District is attached to the Mason Intermediate School District, the area comprising the Baldwin Community School District would not become a part of and subject to the property taxes levied by the West Shore Community College District. (2)

Turning to your second question, 1976 PA 451, supra, Sec. 703(6) provides, in pertinent part:

'. . . The territory of constituent districts transferred to other intermediate school districts by dissolution shall be subject to all taxes levied for purposes of the intermediate school district to which transferred, including taxes for the retirement of bonded indebtedness, special education programs, and area vocational-technical education programs.'

Further, in OAG, 1961-1962, No 3577, p 66 (March 22, 1961), it was concluded, inter alia, that the territory of a disorganized school district attached to a operating school district in which a tax limitation increase for operating purposes was in effect was subject to such tax limitation increase without the approval of the qualified electors of the attached territory. See also OAG, 1965-1966, No 4458, p 167 (November 1, 1965)

It is, therefore, my opinion that if the Lake Intermediate School District is disorganized and the constituent Baldwin Community School District is attached to the Mason Intermediate School District, the area comprising the constituent Baldwin Community School District will be subject to the property taxes levied by the Mason Intermediate School District for special education programs.

Frank J. Kelley

Attorney General

(1) An intermediate school district composed of less than five constituent school districts may become disorganized upon the request of the board of education of each constituent school district pursuant to 1976 PA 451, Sec. 703; MCLA 380.703; MSA 15.4703. Thereafter, with approval of each of the affected intermediate school district boards of education, and the State Board of Education, the constituent school districts may be attached to another intermediate school district. The Baldwin Community School District is the only school district constituent to the Lake Intermediate School District.

(2) It should be observed that, pursuant to 1966 PA 331; MCLA 389.1 et seq; MSA 15.615(101) et seq, Secs. 61, 62 and 63, the West Shore Community College District may, with the approval of the electors of the Baldwin Community School District, annex such school district.

 


[ Previous Page]  [ Home Page ]